Assigned reviews completed meaning journal. ' On Sep 19, the status changed to 'under review.

Assigned reviews completed meaning journal what does this mean? is this mean that the edior will make a decision based only on one review? The author is shown a message when reviews are overdue, but this message does not tell them what to expect. What does this status mean? Is it a bad sign or a good sign that the reviews were completed in 23 days? The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed to with editor again for last 10 days. So basically, your paper has cleared the admin check and has just been assigned to an AE. ' I am surprised to see this. Could you please explain to me what does this I sent a paper to a Springer journal. I wrote an email to the handling editor, and he replies that "I will look into it and get back to you". As it’s been only a month since the status 'Reviewers Assigned' was updated, we recommend you to be patient and wait for the review process to begin and get completed. If the journal editors are not satisfied with the quality or thoroughness of the review provided by the assigned reviewer, they may opt to replace that reviewer with someone else to ensure a more comprehensive and constructive review. I have written an email to editor, who replied that the paper is waiting for the editor's decision. Any article submitted to any journal goes under review if found suitable and within the scope of that journal. The manuscript had the With Editor status for about 4 months. This status could also mean that editors have called for additional reviews, which is also common. It is a software issue or a bug. Recently, I have received a link from the journal with a link to track the peer review status of the article. The status reviews completed was for one week and then it Hi, My manuscript is under the 3rd round of review, with R1 acceptance and R2 revision in the 2nd round. However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to Rather, probably the journal assigned an editor to your submission, but the editor did not want to handle it (because e. It may be a more serious bug. , out of scope, AFTER 1 YEAR of reviews and revisions. Review Complete: shows the date of completion. " This means that the reviews have come back to the editor and he/she will now take a decision on your manuscript. but directly the status changed from editor assigned to reviews complete. Reviewers will assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your It will now be subjected to technical checking and then assigned to an editor. g. In the submission's Action column in any folder. After 2 months of peer review I submitted my paper to the journal Expert Systems With Applications. Next, after 02 moths it is "1/3", after 3 months it is "1/10" and now is "1/11". After different status changes, the tracking system has been showing "Reviews completed" since 21/09/2017. Subscribe and get curated content It means reviewers have been invited, but you can't read anything more than that. 1. After the submission of the second revision, the status was Under Review for 20 days. By clicking on any of the hyperlinks the Editor is provided with a list of submissions based on the number of reviews that have been finished. When a panel of reviewers has agreed to review all submissions for a special issue. From your query, it seems reviewers have been assigned for your manuscript. Which is already a good thing – as that means the associate editor (AE) believes the paper has merit and also matches the journal scope. Now my question is if it is rejection then the editor would immediately send the rejection Congrats on getting sent to review! We just went through this with a nature journal, here’s our timeline: 1. Any decision The status "required reviews completed back to editor assigned" in a manuscript submission system typically means that the peer review process for the manuscript has been Required Reviews Completed. However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to reviews complete. July 1: I made the initial submission. Whether or not reviewers have accepted the invitation is usually confidential information available only to journal staff. Once a revised manucript is submitted to a journal, it goes through another round of review, usually by the same set of reviewers. "The HELP section says: "Revisions Being Processed have Some examples include “editor assigned” “reviewers invited” “under review” “review complete” “decision pending,” and others. Some examples include “editor assigned,” “reviewers invited,” “under review,” “review complete,” “decision pending,” and others. Now, it has changed to ‘Under review. This may involve checking that the submission is within the journal's scope and If you have permission to override review settings for submission, there will be an Edit link just above. The associate editor (AE) will now make a first decision on the manuscript and share this with you shortly. ’ One week later, it The process usually goes these sequence of events. Status changed to Editor Assigned. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Received one okay report in the first round and did major revision. Is it a bad sign? It is common for the peer review status of a manuscript to change several times before a final decision is reached by the editor. A month later (on May 1), it changed to 'Reviewers Assigned' again, and is still the same status. This graphic is an overview of some of the terms used to describe different stages within I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. ) Revisions submitted: the number of revised documents sent in by author. I have a paper submitted to a top journal, which got rejected for shitty reason, i. It remained 'Editor Assigned Pending' until September 18th. Since the workflow was designed to show messages only to those participants who need to act, this message is I again edited my manuscript as the reviewer suggested and submitted the revised version. What does the status from required reviews completed back to editor assigned indicates? Question. The edit link will open a popup overlay where you can edit the settings for this submission. I have submitted revision of my paper at the end of last month and status changed from Reviewers assigned to under review and now since 6 days it is showing reviews completed. ’ If the current reviews conflict with another or are not detailed enough, I may need to seek the opinion of another reviewer. Three weeks ago, the status was changed to "review completed". On March 24, it changed to Required Reviews Completed, and then, changed to Decision in Process. the status can remain ‘Required Reviews Completed’, but as you understand now without meaning that the review of your paper has been completed. Today the status is changed again to 'Reivewers Assigned'. The status changed to ‘Reviewer assigned’ approximately three times every three months. Then, it turned to ‘Under review,’ which I thought was the internal review. 6. If the journal office wants you to solve some technical issues, the manuscript will be returned to you. I submitted a paper to a journal on May 24th, and upto July 24th it was "With editor. The paper was reviewed again and after a few months the status was shown as "reviews completed". ' However, after 15 days, it again changed to 'Reviewers Assigned. What does that mean? Does it mean the manuscript has I have got the same situation. 23 answers Any article submitted to any journal goes under review if found suitable and within Reviews completed --> self-explanatory; Speaking with some experience as an editor of a major(ish) journal, 'Reviewers Assigned' can be ambiguous between whether the reviewers have accepted to review the paper or not. 3 months later, got an email saying "Editor Decision - Revise before review"March 06, 2019: Sent the revised manuscript. 'Move to Submissions with required reviews complete after __ reviews' controls when the submission will move to the status of Required Reviews The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed to with editor again for last 10 days. The grid only reflects submissions with at least one review complete that are in the Editor’s ‘To External Reviews Completed, Waiting for Editorial Decision: Some external reviews are in, please wait patiently for the editor to make a decision Awaiting author revision - see Editor/Author Email log : a decision has been made and we are waiting for a revision / response to reviewer comments from the author (follow the instructions at As Peer review times vary per journal. Note that once completed reviews for your submitted article have been received and are under evaluation by the handling Editor the status may later return to This article shows the editorial process after Submitting a manuscript to a journal. Improve the chances of your manuscript’s acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. The status doesn't say what the recommendation was, but it does say it was finalized. September 15: I received a major revision decision. Now, the status has changed to Reviews Completed. – R I had submitted my preprint to a journal on March 15, 2018. What does the status from required reviews completed back to editor assigned indicates? a manuscript to a reputed journal. However, the Under Review status changed to Reviewers Assigned on Oct 17 and again to Reviewers Assigned on Oct 19. I am confused since the current status was already passed before the editors sent the manuscript out for review. Two days later, it changed to ‘Assigning for review. Required Reviews Completed All necessary reviews have been received by the editorial office (the editor may seek additional reviews in some cases). On September 21, I received an email from the editor stating the following. This is simple. But the status was again changed to "editor assigned". External peer review would not be completed in a few days’ time. No actions are available. Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all peer reviews have been completed. What does this quick process tell? Is there any chance of my paper being rejected? I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal in the field of Applied Statistics. Editor Assigned Any article submitted to any journal goes under review if found suitable and within the scope of that journal. The EiC makes the final decision on the manuscript. The other possibility is that this is a rapid publication journal in which case it is not unusual for the peer review process to be completed within a month. " What does this mean? Once the AE has completed their review, they will make their decision on the manuscript and communicate it to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), changing the status to Decision in Process/Progress. Nowadays journal reviews have become quite unpredictable. , the editor's workload was too heavy, the editor has an ongoing medical or family emergency, or the editor felt another editor would be better equipped to handle your paper). It would be re-reviewed and handled by another editor. Now my question is if it is rejection then the editor would immediately send the rejection I submitted my manuscript to a journal. September 4: The status changed to Reviews Completed. In maintaining high levels of quality through the peer review The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed to with editor again for last 10 days. 4. The status changed from "required review completed" to "decision in process". Any idea about this situation? Does this mean the SE and EIC are making the final decision or they need another reviewer to look Nov 22, 2018: Submitted manuscript. I submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. , one of the reviewers completed their review and submitted it to the editorial system. This is basically a new service where you can see how many reviewers were invited, how many accepted the invitations, and how many have completed the review. ; In the Editor Decision form, the table of completed reviews may be displayed within the form itself, or may be a linked popup window, depending on configuration. In my field(s) one often waits 3-6 month from submission to get a real response to a submission, due largely to the slow review process. required review completed. The status of your manuscript indicates that the review for your revised paper is complete. Depending on the range of statuses the journal uses, this status might even mean that some reviews have been received. The number of review reports is not sufficient. After two days the editor was assigned and after 5 days the status changed to "Reviews Completed". October 5: I submitted the revised manuscript. Finally, the status changed to ‘Required reviews completed. Meaning of status change from 'Under Review' to 'Reviewers Assigned' you need to wait for the next update – for the reviews to be completed. ' After two days (on April 10), the status changed to 'Under Review'. ) I think that for this journal, the status "under review" is used for both internal and external review. After the editoral review, the reviewers were invited, and then the status changed to "Reviewers assigned" for two months. After that, it changed to 'Under Review. If your manuscript goes from "review completed" to "reviewers assigned", the most probable explanation is that the editor has decided to get more reviewers. Partial Review Saved: Shows the date the reviewer saved a partial review. Between this time, I have conducted twice and got the same reply that the manuscript is currently with the editor; and I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. Peer review - The Academic Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. The peer review status of my submitted paper currently indicates "Reviews completed: 1; Review invitations accepted: 1, Review invitations sent: 2+". It was "Under review" until October 28th. Review completed means the review was completed. 2. Did anyone encounter the same Reviewers should be asked to complete the review within 3 weeks, allowing for 4 weeks. An Editor has been assigned, and has not yet taken an action that triggers some other status. When the submission is a commentary on another submission, reviewers from the first submission might be assigned to the commentary. ( 0 means there’s no discussion) I submitted my manuscript to a Springer-based journal on July 1. ” On the other hand, some journals use the status “reviewers assigned” to mean that reviewers have been nominated and invitations have been sent out. I submitted the revised version on October 31st. Could you please tell me what is the meaning of under review and It is a bit unusual that it takes 1 month after the reviews are completed. However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to Once the review is completed, your manuscript will be sent back to the journal editor and the status will change to "With Editor" or "Required reviews completed. We will follow up with late reviewers and keep authors informed if there are any delays. However, today it is changed into "editor assignment pending". After subsequent changes in the status (‘With Editor’ and then ‘Under Review’ for 20 days), it showed as ‘Reviews completed’ on September 4. A manuscript was submitted to one of the journal in springer on 28/04/2017. 08. I see that, after 01 month, status of "Assigned reviews completed" is "0/3". Some journals show the under review status from the time the paper gets to the editor in chief through to the reviewers. The various status updates are as follows. When I contacted the journal (the journal does not allow direct emailing to the editor), I got a reply from the journal office stating that ‘2 Awaiting Referee Reports meaning. Does the status Decision in Process mean or The Editor Assigned status typically means that your manuscript has cleared the initial check (for basic aspects such as adherence to the journal’s guidelines and a scope match) and has now been assigned to an Associate Editor (AE). The reviews have been completed and the concerned editor has been assigned by the journal manager to evaluate the review report, so that he communicate the same to the corresponding author. From August 14 to September 6, it showed as Under Review. However, educated guessing is all I can do, and only asking Elsevier can provide clarification. This message is visible to the author as well which should not. 1 (also in the previous OJS3 versions), when any reviewer does not respond within the due date, the status message changes to “A review is overdue”. After the editorial review, the reviewers were invited, and the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned. " I requested the return of the manuscript to make changes and resubmitted on July 26th. Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all the peer reviews have been completed and received by the editorial office. What does this brief "Under review" means? Dear Team; In OJS3. I have not been asked for a revision. Note that once completed reviews for Answer: Hello, After the review process, editor is assigned to check the quality of the paper and the reviewers comments. Stage 2: Editor assigned. " What does this status mean? Once a revised manucript is submitted to a journal, it goes through another round of review, usually by the same set A part of the online system of this journal is showed in the following figure. The process is to first have a desk check, if that passes the it's assigned to an assistant editor and if he/she thinks it's a good fit, then they send it to 2-3 other reviewers - the editor then takes the feedback/recommendation from each reviewer and ultimately makes a decision. Cite Gaurav H Even if it's rejection, you can always revise and submit to another journal. At present, the status is "Reviewers assigned. Note that once completed reviews for Definition: Manuscript Submitted: After this, the manuscript usually goes through a formatting check by the journal staff before it is assigned to an editor. The paper was reviewed and the reviewers asked for some changes. Only submissions for which the Editor is the ‘Handling Editor’ are displayed. The target number of required reviews has been completed, and the Handling Editor is considering the reviews. We were under review for 6 weeks. Until August 13, the status was Editor Assigned. . Usually, an article being assigened to an editor after review is a good thing. The status changed to "Required reviews completed" on 6th Nov, then back to "Under review," then again When a reviewer has committed to do some certain type of review whenever it is needed, such as submissions in a certain language. The final decision on what to publish rests with the Editor of the journal. Awaiting Admin Processing: Your submission is waiting for initial review by the editorial office. Failure to meet deadlines: Reviewers are typically given a deadline to complete their review. After that, it changed to Editor Assigned, and has been the same since January 17. Now it will go for peer review, which will assess your articleon various criteria and its suitability for publication in that journal. After major revision we have submitted the manuscript back and it went to with editor to under review after one day and to required reviews completed after 2 weeks and then again to under review after 1 day. Now my question is if it is rejection then the editor would immediately send the rejection Hello! I have submitted my paper to a journal and it has been 5 weeks since then. He/she will first review your paper for a match with the journal’s scope, the quality of the paper, and the novelty of the study and decide whether to desk reject it or send it out for peer review. The editor asked us to resubmit the manuscript. ' What's going on? Does this mean it's going to be rejected? Find an answer to your question What it mean editor assigned after reviews completed in springer? drishtigola727 drishtigola727 18. However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to I submitted a manuscript to a journal a month ago but the status was changed to "reviews completed" after "editor assigned," with nothing in between. What is the meaning of editor assigned after 8. ' On Sep 22, the status changed to 'review completed. The system only updated to 'Under Review' when two reviewers have BOTH accepted to review the paper. I sent an email to the editor to ask him to increase the The reviews have been completed and the system administrator or the journal manager assigned the editor (who is assumed to be associated with it earlier) to take care of the review reports and make a call. October 25: The status It can take anywhere between one to four months, depending on the journal and the field of study. I am not sure what this means. Now my question is if it is rejection then the editor would immediately send the rejection I submitted a paper to a Springer journal about 2 months ago. In some cases, the AE may again send the manuscript for peer review. March 07, 2019: Status changed to "Revision being processed". The status of your paper has changed to ‘Required Reviews Completed. The AE will conduct the initial editorial screening to check the scientific value and relevance of the manuscript to the journal. Then I The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed to with editor again for last 10 days. "Required reviews complete" Once a paper is submitted to a journal, it is assigned to a handling editor who conducts an initial screening of the paper to see if it meets the basic requirements of the journal. The AE will now check your manuscript for aspects such as the novelty of the research and the quality of the paper and decide Also, in that case, the status will not change to “under review,” but will change to either of the following: “required reviews completed,” “with editor,” or “decision in process. However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to This article shows the editorial process after Submitting a manuscript to a journal. I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. After one week, the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned,' and it remained so for one day. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly understood, that the actual review begins. ( For exp: 2/3 : 2 out of 3 reviewers have completed the reviewing stage. This process depends on several factors and varies from journal-to-journal. Hello. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 10 days to complete the assignment. Usually it must be changed to under review after editor assigned and then it changes to reviews completed. However, yesterday, September 19th, it directly changed to 'Review Completed. However, this status remained unchanged for the next 1. After a month, I received comments from three reviewers requesting minor revisions. ' I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal on September 2. 22 answers. No confusion , it is just normal practice rejected without going through the peer review process if the Editor decides that they are not suitable for the journal. Now Under Review The assigned editor has initiated the Peer Review process. 2023 Science If the status of the manuscript shifted after the peer review to “with editor” or “editor assigned,” it means that the manuscript was returned to the Associate Editor, who will peruse From your expanded screenshot, I would guess that complete and send review is supposed to actually mean review completed and sent, i. 1 year wasted for nothing. The status “reviews completed” indicates that peer reviewers have finished evaluating your manuscript and the review reports have been sent to the journal. But the confusing part is, is that the reviewer are now done with reviewing (Review completed) but the new status became apperently ''Manuscript under consideration". Subsequently, the date of the status changed to July 13, while the status remained the same. The Any article submitted to any journal goes under review if found suitable and within the scope of that journal. However, there is a possibility that the paper was sent for an external peer review (particularly since "Under review" appears twice) and that the reviewers were very prompt. However, if the status again changes to something similar, it means the AE is having some challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. After that, it changed to "under review" but now, after 20 days, again it changed to "reviewers assigned. Authors should be given some additional contextual information so that they know editors have been made aware and will Hi, We have submitted our manuscript to an Elsevier journal and it came back with major revision. Sometimes, the editor, after going through the reviews The number of currently complete, assigned, and invited reviewers is shown in the section heading. Assigned reviews completed: Number of completed review / Number of assigned reviewers. it is ultimately up to the journal’s individual policy to decide what level of status detail makes the most sense for the journal and Any article submitted to any journal goes under review if found suitable and within the scope of that journal. What does this mean? How many days will it take for a How? Click the View Reviews and Comments link in one of the of following locations: . After the 1st round of review one of the reviewers rejected the manuscript and subsequently the paper was rejected by the editor. I revised the paper and sent it again. Note: these terms will vary by journal. Sent an email yesterday to enquire its status. Sometimes, the editor, after going through the reviews, might feel that an additional review is required. It seems that the journal uses “Editor assigned” whenever that the This could mean one of the following: 'reject', 'submit as new', 'major revision, 'minor revision' or 'accept' (Depending on the journal, options may change). I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Can you help? I sent an email and explained my situation (applying to PhD programs) and the editor promised to complete the review of my paper unit the end of the coming week. The online tracking system status was as follows: 17 Apr: New submission 18 Apr: Editor assigned 08 May: Under review 27 May: Reviews completed 29 May: Under review 06 Jun: Under review 25 Jun: Reviewers assigned. Two days ago Generally it takes 4 to 8 weeks or even more for an initial decision by the journal. Based on the peer review recommendation, the assigned editor The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed to with editor again for last 10 days. They consider either being with the editor or the reviewers The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed to with editor again for last 10 days. Reviewers will assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your I submitted to a mathematics journal on August 20, 2023, and the next day the system status changed to 'Editor Assigned Pending'. The fact that the status changed from "Required Reviews Completed An Editor has been assigned, and has not yet taken an action that triggers some other status. @FredDouglis Or the editor is a clumsy little butterfingers and clicked "Reviews completed" by accident instead of "Reviewers Requested" or "Reviewers Assigned" and hasn't noticed. After 3 days of sending my paper to the reviewers by the editor i have a new status saying that "New reviews have been submitted and are being considered by the editor". After 3 weeks my paper status was changed to "Required reviews completed" but after a day it was changed to "Under Meaning of 'Reviewers Assigned' after a minor revision in Springer's Editorial Manager This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. The Editors may take time to After resubmitting with revisions, the status changed to "reviews completed. Peer review. But now the status of my paper has been changed from "under review" to "reviewers assigned"!!!It means that new reviewers are supposed to review my paper!! I submitted a paper 10 months ago to Springer on behalf of Pramana – Journal of Physics. The status changed to "Under review" on April 27, 2018 and then "Required reviews completed" on October 4, 2018. It's understood from my experience that once a paper is submitted the editor(s) concerned makes a quick review of its suitability given Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Could you guide me what it means and is it possible the reviewers reject it despite their first opinions? After submission, the status first indicated that the editor has been assigned. Anybody has experienc What does the status from required reviews completed back to editor assigned indicates? Question. I have submitted a math paper to an Elsevier journal. After that we sent a rebuttal letter to editor. After reviews cane back, Manuscript Under Consideration again for 7 days. I have submitted my article to a peer reviewed journal on Sep 14, 2015. After 4 months, my paper status was changed to "Required reviews completed", but after two weeks it was changed to "Under review" again. ; In the left sidebar of the Reviewer Selection Summary page. ' On Sep 19, the status changed to 'under review. ’. e. Going by this logic, "All reviews complete" seem to indicate that all the reviewers have accepted the review invitation. 2. When I checked the link on the 16th of April, I saw that the status has “Required reviews completed” essentially means that the minimum number of reviews required by the journal are completed. Last week the status was changed to 'Reviews completed'. They have given a major revision decision twice. However, the status of my paper is now "Editor assigned" on October 9, In case it means that the AE review is complete, the next step might be either a peer review or a referral to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) of the decision. Hello! I submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal 6 months ago. After three months, the status on the website was ‘Required Reviews Completed’. But the latter remained a bout 30 days. Anyone experienced this before? What does it mean? Feel exhausted about this paper. The reviewer finished it and submitted it. The Editorial office receives the reviewer comments and assesses them. (In the case of a special issue, a tighter deadline may be required. Now my question is if it is rejection then the editor would immediately send the rejection It is possible. For this reason, the status of your I submitted my manuscript on Oct 5 in a Springer Psychology journal. 表示审稿意见已经返回给编辑，等编辑处理。这一步也叫With editor。 Authors may approach the journal’s Editorial office to check on the status of the manuscript and request for an expedited review in case the specified review period has lapsed. August 12: The status changed to Under Review. I edited my manuscript as they suggested and submitted the revised version. However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to I submitted a manuscript to a Springer-based journal (3 Biotech) on June 3. 3. In turn, the most I have a paper which was submitted to one of Springer journals 3 months ago and for more than 2 months its status was "under review". Now my question is if it is rejection then the editor would immediately send the rejection Any article submitted to any journal goes under review if found suitable and within the scope of that journal. I have done a submission to other journal some months before and the "with editor Any article submitted to any journal goes under review if found suitable and within the scope of that journal. At the same time, journals may opt to display fewer statuses. However, till date, I have not received a decision. The journal editors are experts in their field and make unbiased, independent decisions. Hi all - I submitted a paper to a reputable journal mid-November. It does not mean that the journal editors have gone through the reviews yet. The status changed to With Editor on February 28 and to Under Review on March 2/3. In case the status doesn’t change for a few weeks or there is no communication from the journal, you may write to them As a co-author, i saw recently that our paper switched from status. Our reviews were fairly positive, but How can anyone answer? We can't know the internals of a reviewing system (beyond explaining the reviewing process, which is explained elsewhere on this site), for instance, it could mean the editor made a mistake, asked for help, and it was fixed after two days, or it may have been under review, reviews submitted, and the editor requesting a further review, or I submitted journal in the field of psychometrics about one year ago. 5 months. Open discussions: Correspondences between editor and author. On Sep 18, the status changed to 'editor assigned. My guess is that the first "Under review" appeared when the first reviewer accepted the review invitation. Hello, I have experienced a manuscript tracking that is a little odd. and 1/4 Assigned reviews completed. Peer review times vary per journal. ’ I would like to know whether ‘Under review’ means an internal or an external This depends a great deal on the particular journal. I think it’s best to wait for the next status update for more clarity. Stage 3: Peer review. Improve the chances of your manuscript’s acceptance by If a reviewer requests changes to a completed review before the decision is sent to author, and you agree the changes should be made: Locate the submission in EM and select 'View Reviews and Comments' to open a The status 'with Editor or Editor Assigned' will depend upon the journal 1st decision, which is especially high for some journal. But, after that, the status changed to "Under review" for three days, and then it changed to "Reviewers assigned" again. My question: In situations where one reviewer's report is complete, will the editor typically base the initial decision on the sole I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using Editorial Manager on February 27, 2020. However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to 6. After 2 months of peer review process, the response was “moderate revision has been requested” and they told me that the new version is Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The status changes you mention are slightly unusual. Buttons for 'Send Reminder' and 'Unassign Reviewer' appear at the right. ' Now, after three weeks, the status date of the manuscript has changed, but the status remains 'Reviewers Assigned. 同行评审，耗时最久，也是影响杂志社决定的关键环节。现投稿量激增，为保证质量，高水平的杂志均事先设in-house review，不过关的稿件被立即拒绝。 9. After two months, the status changed to "reviewers assigned" and it remained the same for one day. After passing the initial check, it stayed with the "Reviewers Assigned" status until 12 Oct and went Under Review on 13 Oct. From my experience (as author of more than 200 papers and as editor-in-chief of some journal) it is usually more like a few days or a week but it can vary depending on the journal. The journal requires two reviews, but regularly invites four (this makes sense because reviewers decline to review, never respond to the invitation, agree but don't submit a review by the deadline, etc). Stage 1: Initial quality check This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. I'm facing the same problem at presenting and it has passed almost 6 months. The peer reviewer would assess the soundness of the science. ) Though the Journal Tool provides a means for sending reminders to the reviewers, the AE should monitor the progress of the reviews and send a personal email or use other means of I have submitted my manuscript to a Springer journal. Reviews Completed means that the peer review of the manuscript is complete. The Editor may be reading and assessing the submission, assigning additional editors according to the journal's polices, or taking some other action outside of the system. What could be the reason for the current status? Is the review process completed or are more Recently, I submitted a paper to a journal. The journal staff in the editorial office, once they receive a manuscript check it that all requirements are fulfilled as per the journal guidelines. (I have a book under review right now that I sent out in September and still only have one of the three reviewer's reports back. After three months of 'Under review', the status changed to 'Required review completed' a week ago, then it became 'With editor'. cyacwp iepyqeu itwciff dsqgysh vpobjp hpo ijzup tdq hmbr olgcds